This post is a response to
this article which I read online today from my hometown newspaper, The Charlotte Observer.
As I read this article, I felt really sad. Sad for this poor girl who has been so entrapped by Hollywood that she thinks that is what she is supposed to be looking for in her own life. Sad because she is so obviously lonely. Sad because in 4 years no one is going to be playing Mario Kart anymore. Sad because she is another bad relationship away from owning a cat. Sad that her "in jest" comment is a very very thin veil as to the shallowness that she recognizes in her own heart. Sad for any girl who thinks that marriage is about these kinds of things. Sad because she is the editor of a bridal magazine, and the fact that
she is writing something that is to be taken as expert on marriage is an all true reality of what marriage has become in America. If it isn't enough proof, right beside this article on the home page of the Observer website was an article about John Edwards and his wife Elizabeth separation in the aftermath of his affair.
I was married just less than a year ago, and my sister is getting married in April, so marriage is something that is a very present part of my life. As my one year anniversary approaches, I have been thinking more and more about what a joy marriage is supposed to be, how it is so supposed to honor God, and how much of a mockery modern American culture has made of it.
Often my wife has conversations with her language tutor about her marriage. Shelley is heartbroken that her language tutor tells her that her and her husband sometimes go 3 days without speaking a word to each other. There are very many marriages in this country that are broken by men who don't know what it means to be a man, yet after we hear one of these heartbreaking stories, the East Asian can still say with confidence "but it isn't as bad as your America. We don't have a 50% divorce rate." We can't imagine what it would be like to have your parents decide who you will marry like many Middle Eastern cultures, yet their divorce rates are several times lower than those in America. In fact, Muslim extremists name American's rate of divorce as a reason why Middle Eastern nations should avoid the invasion of Western culture at all costs. I'm not suggesting that extremist Islam is a right path, or that the cold relationships between a husband and wife in East Asia is a model of marriage, I'm just saying that we cannot deny that something has gone awry in American's definition of marriage.
Now before I continue, let me just say I am not some Focus on the Family guru whose wife wears high collars and ankle-covering skirts, and I don't plan on keeping my 13 kids couped up in a compound away from the devil and the world (That is not a sterotyping of Focus on the Family gurus, just a clarification). In actuality, I don't like James Dobson because he has a min on one hand, but uses that platform to endorse politicians for the Republican party. (I wonder how many great family people voted for Mark Sanford to be governor of South Carolina based on the suggestion of some Religious Right half p*stor-half lobbyist.) Having said that, I do believe that families remain broken in America, and that is because in a large part marriages in America are broken. Lose the marriage, the rest of the family will soon follow. The sad thing about that is Alison Henry's magazine is a clear picture that things are only going to get worse. For many a 40-50 year old couple who are going through divorce right now, the problem is often traced to financial stress (most often associated with high debt), an affair, or one or both partners not being satisfied in bed (often leading to an affair). The thing is, for many of those couples from that generation, they entered marriage with an understanding of what it is supposed to be and the commitment to make it last a lifetime. Nowadays, 20 something couples getting married often don't even go into it with that understanding. If those who had a basic understanding of marriage some 20-30 years ago aren't making it, then goodness knows what will happen to my generation that are fed the crock that true love is what the horse-faced girl from Sex in the City says. Alison Henry is obviously buying into it, and using her "bridal" magazine as a platform to promote it to the target market of bridal magazines: single women who desperately want to be married.
And thats a starting point for the problems of marriage in America: marriage isn't what getting married is about, a wedding is what getting married is about. Reduce marriage to a wedding, and you end up with marriage as an industry, and man has it ever become that. Bridal magazines are a clear sign. Flip through one of them and read what happiness is supposed to be. Marriage isn't about 60 years together. Its about the biggest diamond, the perfect dress, and the prettiest cake. It is sad that so many marriages end up in divorce, because the wedding that started it all off many times involved a second mortgage to pull it off. My Dad knew this all too well. When he went to rent a beachhouse for my sister's upcoming nuptials, the guy asked him what will you be using the house for? He said "an event." "What kind of event?" "A big event." My Dad didn't wanted to tell him it would be for a wedding because if you tag the word "wedding" onto anything, it automatically doubles the price of that commodity. I don't even want to know what my own wedding cost my parents-in-law because I am scared if I found out I would have to cut off my right leg and offer it to them along with indenturing myself to servanthood to them for the rest of my life on my remaining leg. All this to say, behind the wedding is something that lasts long after the bouquets have withered. Something that takes more work than a magazine will ever suggest (especially the respected publication "Carolina Bride", which probably has a readership of about 27). Something that can't be found only in a man with perfect scruff who lets you win at Mario Kart. Something that is difficult at times. Something that can't be sold or commoditized. Something that is down right impossible to happen apart from the grace of the Father.
It doesn't make sense to me sometimes the Father kept marriage after the fall. When 2 people doomed to sin from birth enter into a lifetime covenant, well how is that going to work out? It is one of those situations if I was the Father where I would say "there is no way that is going to work now. Let's scrap the whole marriage idea. Maybe stork delivery was a better way to go afterall." But I'm not the Father. I can't work miracles like he can. And that is the beauty of marriage in a nutshell. It reflects his creativity, his love, and his ability to work miracles. To bring 2 covenant breakers into a covenant relationship that brings him joy is impossible apart from his ability to work miracles. We can't keep covenants in our sin. Only he can. That is why Abraham didn't have to walk through the pieces of the heifer. The Father knew he couldn't keep a covenant (see Hagar), so why make him make one in the first place? God made that covenant, and he kept it all the way to turning his face away from his own sinless son on a cross. We can't keep covenants. So marriage is a miracle that requires him to work. Take the only one who can redeem us out of the picture, and we are left to ruin. That is one reason why divorce is an abomination to him. It is more than just giving up on each other, it is giving up on the only one who ever gave you a chance to make it in the first place. I was running through my old neighborhood in Charlotte last year and I saw one of my neighbors working out in her yard. I knew that she had just recently lost her husband, and I stopped to talk to her and asked how she was doing. She said "its horrible. I miss him so much. How do you just keep going after 58 years together?" Is that not what marriage is about? They had a wedding somewhere in the past, but for the time since then she had been waking up with him to get him breakfast and lunch ready before he went to work driving a truck, making dinner for him for when he got home. That is a picture of 2 becoming 1 if ever there was one. That's a miracle. When Shelley and I started dating, I had lunch with an old friend of mind and asked him about marriage. He had been married for about 5 years at this point, and at one point in the conversation he told me "I've never been angrier with anyone than I have been with my wife, and she's never been angrier with anyone than she has with me." Try putting that on a Tiffany's commercial. That is the beauty of marriage. They love each other to the core in spite of sinning against each other. My counseling professor told us at a marriage conference this summer "real love is learning to live the monotany of the day in and day out with each other and to love each other in the midst of that monotany." That can't be marketed. It would crash and burn. But it is true. Until our generation understands that marriage is so much more than a wedding, and that love is so much more than being "artistic yet ambitious" (whatever the heck that is supposed to mean), that you won't fall asleep every night with a scruffy dude caressing your hair, and that it is physically impossible for your wife to look like the sorority girl you met on campus after nourishing, birthing, and nursing your line for the better part of her 20s and 30s, the outlook for succesful marriage is grim. Marriage is not about you getting what you want. It's not even about your spouse. It's about the Father, and reflecting the beauty of redemption, and the fact that he would even allow sinful people to attempt to reflect that beauty. Until that is understood and restored, marriage will continue to be a shadow of what it is supposed to be.